The Bugleverse Wiki

The only wiki with the balls to document the whole Bugle News universe.

Storyline

The Revolution Won't Have Good UX

The Revolution Won’t Have Good UX is the Bugleverse’s oldest and most load-bearing law: the proposition that bad user experience is not a defect of Bitcoin software but the mechanism by which the revolution selects its participants. It functions simultaneously as doctrine, as an apology the hosts issue for their own broken equipment, as a clothing line, and as a magazine byline. It is the only Bugle bit that has been coined twice, sold as merchandise, set to verse by a listener, quoted back at the show as an insult, and published in Bitcoin Magazine.

Who’s in it: Richard Greaser · Rod Palmer · Timmy Tether · BTCKaz · Evan Kaloudis · Erin Redwing · Heavily Armed Clown · Late Stage Hodl · Fountain

The doctrine before the phrase (2024)

The idea is in the record long before the words are. In July 2024 Richard Greaser offers as proof of sovereignty that “I opened a lightning channel myself on my on my typewriter,”1 with David Bennett as counterparty — the difficulty is the point of the boast.

By October 2024 Rod Palmer has the thesis in a sentence: “Yeah. Hard money should be hard to use.”2 He reaches it by way of France, where the Lightning Network is said not to work because failed routes mean the French “just surrender,” and being a sovereign node runner is accordingly a black belt: “Most girls can’t do it. But if you’re puff and you believe in yourself, you can achieve it.”

The phrase arrives (February 2025)

The catchphrase first surfaces in its canonical wording on 20 February 2025, when Greaser answers a guest’s struggles with Nostr — the ASR renders it “Noister” throughout — by observing that “the revolution will not have good UX.”3 Rod immediately converts it into the justification for the whole 40HPW regime: “You gotta be able to put that effort in… Like, the UX here is terrible. Lightning the UX is terrible.”

Four days later Greaser restates it — “people need to realize that the the revolution won’t have good UX”4 — and Rod escalates it into a test: if it isn’t inconvenient it isn’t secure, and if it doesn’t have bad UX it is not cypherpunk. The same episode produces the doctrine’s own currency. A Fountain boost arrives twice by accident, Rod names the phenomenon — “We just call it proof of bad UX” — and Greaser rebrands it on air: “Proof of revolution?”, spelled out as P O R.5

By 27 February Rod is citing it as settled house canon, “the the revolution will not have good user experience,” explicitly flagged as something the show has covered “many many times.”6 Its application: the tip-of-the-spear cypherpunks migrate to whichever platform is least pleasant, and Nostr is boot camp — joining a Twitter meme gang untrained “is like going to prison.”7

Episode 50: the show performs its own title (March 2025)

On 10 March 2025 the bit acquires an episode. Twenty minutes into coverage of the strategic Bitcoin reserve news, Rod is cut off mid-word and an unnamed announcer declares the recording lost: “We are sad to announce that this episode has been cut short due to technical difficulties.”8 Timmy Tether arrives to name the culprits — “Whether it’s the unreliable recording fidelity of Riverside”9 — and then delivers the title as though it had always existed: “This further demonstrates the truth behind the well known turn of phrase, the revolution won’t have good UX.”10 The claim of prior fame is the joke; it is also, as the February beats show, half true. (See [[#disputed|Disputed]].)

The episode closes on Piez, crowned “the MVP of Bitcoin podcast listeners” and denied his prestige ranking because Fountain has never built the leaderboard.11

The following week Greaser folds the collapse into the mission statement: “We’re the front line of the orange revolution. We are battling bad UX.”12 Timmy is thanked for saving the show,13 Rod issues the standing apology “on your behalf,” and the audience begins returning the bit with interest. Late Stage Hodl mourns the lost ending and introduces docking;14 Open Mike boosts 7,777 sats from 30,000 feet into “the Bugle UX fund”;15 and a listener known only as Odie submits a cypherpunk poem whose chorus is the episode title — “The revolution will not have good UX. No easy flow, no seamless text.”16

Two weeks after that, the phrase becomes a product: Greaser announces “the revolution will not have good UX clothing line” at OrangeLabel,17 confirmed the following month as “this revolution won’t have good UX,” shipping alongside his Comply line and Rod’s 40 HPW line.18

Is good UX counter-revolutionary? (March 2025)

The doctrine gets its first sustained interrogation on 27 March, when BTCKaz arrives with Bubble FM, pitched as “a fountain killer.”19 Greaser states the position under examination without flinching: “You want the UX to be bad because you want it to feel authentic,”20 and volunteers that this is precisely why he likes Fountain. He then asks the title question outright — could you “create a product with good UX and kinda take away from the revolution?” — and Kaz answers “Absolutely,” accepting the frame.21

Kaz’s own thesis is the inverse: “I wanna abstract the Bitcoin away, to be honest.”22 He positions Bubble as “a micro strategy version of Bitcoin… the UX is just a little bit easier for the normies,”23 and concedes the price without being pressed: “you will probably have to KYC for us to accomplish this UX that I’m talking about.”24

Rather than reject him, the hosts absorb him. Greaser reframes abstraction as covert conscription — “recruit people to the revolution without them even knowing about it” — Kaz answers “Bingo,” and Rod lands it as a psyop.25 Rod reconciles the two apps along the 40HPW axis: Bubble is the ramp, because “there has to be a podcast app for people who haven’t listened to forty hours yet,” and Fountain is what you graduate to.26 The episode’s designated purist is not present: Rod invokes Pledditor and his pinned checklist — “You have to have like an old shitty laptop” — as the foil the argument is aimed at.27 Rod also wagers Kaz will ship Lightning before Swan does.28

The verdict comes from the audience, 4,000 sats at a time: “Bad UX is a revolution, no doubt. But bit but bad podcast episodes take the revolution to another level.” Rod thanks him.29

The excuse era (April–June 2025)

Through spring the phrase is used almost exclusively as cope. Greaser’s video freezes mid-announcement: “Technical difficulties, revolution won’t have good UX, but now I’m back.”30 zap.stream dies before he is on air: “Revolution won’t have good UX. How about that shit?”31 When zap.stream forces the debate onto Twitter, he blames his own doctrine, alleging the developers heard him say it and “Use an excuse to quiet quit.”32 A booster lands it back on him mid-failure, and he admits it took him six months to learn the tool.33

The affirmative case gets sharper too. Rod argues from a Zeus post that bad UX is protective — “if the Lightning Network really worked, do you think we’d be so lucky?” — concluding that bad user experience helps you avoid tariffs.34 Monero’s five-minute wallet sync is good because “it’s enough time to smoke a cigarette” with your dealer.35 Thirty-hour Dave Collum episodes are absolved by it — “The revolution will not have good UX” — because “His podcasts are not bad. They’re signal.”36 In Vegas it becomes practical advice about liquidity and geofenced custodial wallets: “If you wanna participate in the revolution,” have a game plan for bad UX.37

It also gets its formal rationale. Prompted by Erin Redwing discovering a Nostr client whose search bar was fake, Greaser explains that “the revolution won’t have good UX is because it filters out all the casuals,” leaving only the hardcore.38 Erin is the first guest to refuse the frame and ask the hosts to defend it: she quotes it back — “the bane of my existence” — and asks whether they think it is morally right, or merely a natural law they are observing.39 Her structural answer is that Bitcoin VC funds products for love rather than return, which Rod endorses: “Matt Odell and Marty, I don’t think they ever ever invested in a profitable company but they keep doing it.”40 Her own contribution to the canon is friction made optional: ordinals wallets are simply better wallets, and “The ordinals mode is, like, the hard mode for the the wallet itself” — to which a host answers, immediately, use ordinals mode.41

The sharpest rebuttal comes from Heavily Armed Clown. JoinMarket’s unusability triggers the catchphrase, Greaser escalates to intent — products “are are designed with bad UX on purpose to ensure that they continue to be revolutionary” — and Hack simply declines: “I don’t think it’s usually an intentional decision. I think it’s usually that the best engineers don’t like to think about moving around pixels and picking colors.”42 The hosts concede nothing and reach for a slogan instead: cypherpunks don’t use Figma.

The doctrine’s costs are visible where the show does not press them. Tatum gets a Jack Dorsey interview by sending a Nostr DM and receiving a one-word reply.43 Open Mike describes personally onboarding a musician who is then lectured about wallet sovereignty and leaves: “I just wanna play songs and and engage with my fans. Like, get the fuck out of my face.”44 And when CryptoMags’ episode collapses at the end, Greaser signs off with the law and a re-coronation: “The revolution won’t have good UX, but really appreciate her coming on this show. She truly is the Canadian queen of paper Bitcoin.”45

Pressure creates good UX (June 2025)

The only guest to answer the doctrine on its own engineering terms is Evan Kaloudis. Asked how he survives a live demo failure, he does not defend Lightning’s reliability: “Well, first of all, I made sure that the graphics still look fucking awesome”46 — when the transaction fails. He literalizes low time preference as a settings toggle, raising the payment timeout so the transaction goes through one way or the other.47 Rod, who has spent a year insisting friction is virtue, capitulates in one line: “it’s like, if you’re gonna make me wait in the lobby, at least give me art.”48 The episode’s tagline is Rod’s: “The wallet that can handle the pressure.”49 Evan’s stated goal — “We wanna make you feel like a god” — is the exact inverse of the filter thesis, and goes unchallenged.

The article (August 2025)

On 18 August the phrase leaves podcasting. Greaser opens the inaugural Greaser’s Take alone, without Rod, cold open or compliance warning,50 to read “my most recent article in Bitcoin magazine titled The Revolution”51 “Won’t Have Good UX.”52 The Bugle’s habitual target now publishes a Bugle host.

The article itself is barely about UX. Its opening line canonizes Adam Curry as “the modern day Prometheus,”53 argues from podcasting’s reach,54 and ends on the formulation the bundle cuts off after: “While Bitcoin seeks to separate money and state, podcasting seeks to separate syndicated news organizations and information.”55

The sequel is an alleged memory-holing. In October, Rod claims Bitcoin Magazine pulled its Lightning issue from the store,56 and Greaser supplies the motive: “maybe Greasers on to something here.”57 He fuses the doctrine to the PodConf indictment — the conference sells “KYC, listen to Plebslop, buy paper Bitcoin” because it profits from dependent consumers.58 Much later he confirms the grievance was reciprocated: at least one company was upset with him for writing in Bitcoin Magazine that they had bad UX.59

Meanwhile the law generalizes into the frontier vocabulary. Late Stage Hodl, unable to find the subscribe button, restates it as “The frontier does not have good UX.”60 Greaser closes a Fountain support answer with “it it just might be that the revolution doesn’t have good UX.”61 Rod had already supplied the corollary: there is no war on the frontier “because there’s nothing to fight over” — the user experience isn’t good enough for war.62 A produced University of Bitcoin spot quotes the show at itself — “So what if the revolution doesn’t have good UX?” — and answers with a woman unafraid of one.63 And on Matt Odell‘s own episode Rod states the project outright: the plebs are to be renamed. “We do have a name for them. We call them we call them pioneers.”64 Odell endorses it.

Good UX is a security flaw (2026)

The 2026 material inverts the argument rather than repeating it. Greaser’s structural claim is that the two goods are held by different populations: “engineers are too autistic to understand user experience, but they they do know how to make secure systems.”65 He retcons the filter war on the same basis — the core devs “are too autistic to give the plugs the UX that they want”66 — and gives the whole bit a philosophy, Huxley’s Brave New World, where “control comes into existence is through good UX, through convenience.”67

Rod supplies the hard version. He builds an inverted security ladder — Wallet of Satoshi and Ledger have great UX and no security68 — and lands the episode’s chapter title: “good UX is a security flaw,” because attackers won’t sit through a bad one.69 Applied to Saylor, the argument becomes paper Bitcoin’s whole pitch: “you just gotta go on the Robinhood, search for MSTR, and then hit why.”70

The law keeps finding new surfaces. Nostr becomes a digital smoking pit whose friction is therapeutic — the UX is so bad that “by the time they figure out how to post their crash out,” you’ve had time to reflect.71 Need Creations agitates for his buddies to bet the BIP 110 market without having set up a Lightning wallet.72 Podcasts are to be inscribed into blocks, loaded onto OpenDimes and smuggled into North Korea inside donkeys — mules, Greaser corrects — with the UX defended by reference to 1999 Napster download times.73 Rob Wallace lands the law unprompted and improves it: “it will be Noster based, and, UX will suck. And you’ll only see half the messages,” which is good, because you’ll appreciate the ones that get through.74 Maxi Madness 2026 moves to Nostr with the prophecy attached,75 and when the bracket breaks Rod shrugs: this is prediction market on the frontier.76 The maxim’s most recent canonical restatement is reached via mosquito bites sustained while sunning one’s balls: “the revolution. The frontier does not have a good user experience.”77

Its most recent statement, however, is a defection. Arguing that custodial Lightning will beat eCash, Rod reasons that “you don’t have to outrun the bear. You just have to outrun” the pudgy club you’re camping with — custodial Lightning only has to have the better user experience, and it wins.78 He identifies the demand honestly: “That’s what boomers want from banks. They just want the customer service. They want the glaze and their money back.”79 The show that spent two years arguing bad UX selects for revolutionaries closes the record conceding that good UX simply wins.

Disputed

When was the phrase coined? Timmy Tether presents it on 10 March 2025 as an already-established proverb — “the well known turn of phrase, the revolution won’t have good UX”10 — and the episode is titled after it. But it is spoken in essentially final form eighteen days earlier by Greaser,3 and again on 24 February,4 and cited by Rod on 27 February as something discussed “many many times.”6 The doctrine without the words goes back further still, to Rod’s “Hard money should be hard to use” in October 2024.2 Henry’s reading: the phrase was in circulation before episode 50 and the “well known turn of phrase” line is a joke about coining canon by asserting it — but the joke is the coinage, and both origin claims are canon.

Is bad UX intentional? Greaser’s position is design: products “are are designed with bad UX on purpose to ensure that they continue to be revolutionary.”80 Heavily Armed Clown, a builder, says it is not a decision at all — the best engineers don’t want to move pixels.42 Erin Redwing presses the same seam from the other side, asking whether the hosts hold it as a moral claim or a natural law; the record contains no answer from them.39 The wiki does not adjudicate. All three readings remain live, and Rod’s 2026 eCash concession78 is closer to Hack’s than to Greaser’s.

The seeded page was wrong. The prior version of this page dated the storyline 2025-03 to 2025-08 and listed five episodes, drawn from a sweep of titles and headlines. The beat index carries seventy-nine beats across thirty-six episodes from July 2024 to May 2026 — the title-matching sweep caught the episodes named after the phrase and missed the arc, which is mostly carried in episodes named after other things. The seeded page also placed Rob Hamilton in the storyline via the Vegas “Scaling With Paper Bitcoin” panel; no beat in this index supports his involvement, and he is omitted here.

Related: storylines/richard-greaser-philosopher · storylines/pioneers-of-the-frontier · storylines/40-hours-per-week · storylines/fountain-podcasting-2-0 · storylines/nostr-watch · storylines/paper-bitcoin-menace · storylines/david-bailey-bitcoin-magazine · storylines/behind-the-podcast · storylines/core-vs-knots-war

irl: Aldous Huxley (ASR: “Albus Huxley”), Riverside, JoinMarket, Zeus, Wallet of Satoshi, Ledger, Coldcard and Bitcoin Magazine are real. Their conduct in this storyline is not documented outside it.

Footnotes

  1. Bugle Weekly 18 @ 19:05. Quote spans two adjacent cues; the counterparty is named at 19:14 as “David Bennett from Bitcoin.” ↩

  2. Bugle Weekly 31 @ 1:16:12. Elaborated 1:16:14–1:17:02. ↩ ↩2

  3. Behind The Podcast 10 @ 1:03:24. ASR renders Nostr as “Noister” throughout; Rod’s expansion runs 1:03:28–1:03:56. ↩ ↩2

  4. Bugle Weekly 48 @ 1:04:26. Quote spans two cues; Rod’s corollary at 1:05:14. ↩ ↩2

  5. Bugle Weekly 48 @ 1:08:05. The cue spans a speaker change — “proof of bad UX” is Rod’s, “Proof of revolution?” is Greaser’s at 1:08:09. ↩

  6. Behind the Podcast 11 @ 13:35. ↩ ↩2

  7. Behind the Podcast 11 @ 18:26. ASR “meme game” is meme gang. ↩

  8. Bugle Weekly 50 @ 21:17. The announcer is unnamed and appears for seven cues only; the thesis is stated at 21:25 as “Half of the battle is fighting bad u x, but don’t lose hope.” ↩

  9. Bugle Weekly 50 @ 22:23. Continues into Fountain’s “lack of emphasis on Bitcoin podcast listeners, user experience.” ↩

  10. Bugle Weekly 50 @ 23:02. Verbatim fragment of a longer cue. ↩ ↩2

  11. Bugle Weekly 50 @ 27:19. ASR renders Piez as “Pies” throughout. ↩

  12. Bugle Weekly 51 @ 2:15. Same cue continues “Last week, we had some issues with bad UX.” ↩

  13. Bugle Weekly 51 @ 2:24. Rod’s apology formula follows at 2:40. ↩

  14. Bugle Weekly 51 @ 44:33. ASR reads the booster as “late stage huddle.” ↩

  15. Bugle Weekly 51 @ 46:11. Quote spans two cues. ↩

  16. Bugle Weekly 51 @ 49:39. Beat confidence is medium: the poet is called “Odie” and “the OD forty hours per week boost,” and “OD” is a common shortening of Odell, but nothing in the passage identifies him. No character is attributed here. ↩

  17. Bugle Weekly 52 @ 45:12. Quote spans two cues; ship date given as “the next few weeks.” ↩

  18. Bugle Weekly 54 @ 49:45. See merch/orangelabel-co and merch/comply-clothing-line. ↩

  19. Behind The Podcast 12 @ 2:07. ASR calls the guest “Taz” here, “Kaz Biko” at 1:43. Bubble FM has no wiki page. ↩

  20. Behind The Podcast 12 @ 9:15. Built from 9:04, “one of the reasons why I like Fountain so much is because the UX is bad.” ↩

  21. Behind The Podcast 12 @ 9:42. Diarization leak — the cue runs Greaser’s question and Kaz’s “Absolutely” together. ↩

  22. Behind The Podcast 12 @ 11:37. ↩

  23. Behind The Podcast 12 @ 10:02. ↩

  24. Behind The Podcast 12 @ 22:11. He doubles down at 22:40: “a custodial account inside your podcast app. And if that pisses people off, that’s fine.” ↩

  25. Behind The Podcast 12 @ 17:21. The “psyop” tag closes a cue merging Kaz’s sentence with Rod’s interjection; the line is Rod’s. ↩

  26. Behind The Podcast 12 @ 16:46. Completed at 16:52–17:18. ↩

  27. Behind The Podcast 12 @ 18:02. ASR mangles Pledditor as “Plattator” and “Platter”; “the Thomas profile” is ASR for “the top of his profile.” This is characters/pledditor, not characters/matt-odell, who is not mentioned in this episode. ↩

  28. Behind The Podcast 12 @ 29:27. The cue merges Rod’s question with Kaz’s reply. ↩

  29. Behind The Podcast 12 @ 51:09. 4,000 sats from “Rakan,” signed off “Great bad job”; Rod at 51:18: “don’t know how to interpret that one.” ↩

  30. Bugle Weekly 53 @ 41:56. Quote spans two cues; the freeze interrupts the Vegas plug. ↩

  31. Richard Greaser Vs. Mike Brock Debate @ 0:59. Recurs verbatim at 2:09 and 21:23. ↩

  32. Bugle Weekly 55 @ 16:52. Punchline completes at 16:58. ↩

  33. Spamming Vegas Livestream @ 1:30:04. ASR renders BTC Onboard as “B two c onboard”; Richard’s admission at 1:30:17. ↩

  34. Bugle Weekly 54 @ 37:22. Verbatim fragment of one long cue; payoff at 37:34. ↩

  35. Bugle Weekly 54 @ 39:24. Verbatim fragment; the diarizer folds Rod’s interjection into Richard’s cue, so speaker is unreliable at sentence level. ↩

  36. Behind the Podcast 15 @ 57:50. Rod says it twice in the cue, the second time as “The revolution will not have good x” (ASR drop). Dave Collum (ASR: “Dave Colum”, “Dave Collin”) has no character page. ↩

  37. Bugle Weekly 57 @ 1:02:14. Completed at 1:02:22, “game plan for bad UX.” ↩

  38. Behind the Podcast 14 @ 54:57. ↩

  39. Behind the Podcast 14 @ 52:24. The cue is labelled S3 but Rod’s answer bleeds in at the end; the quoted words are Erin’s. ↩ ↩2

  40. Behind the Podcast 14 @ 59:44. ASR: “ten thirty one” for Ten31. This is the real Matt Odell, not Pledditor. ↩

  41. Behind the Podcast 14 @ 1:01:18. Title origin for “Cypherpunks Use Ordinals Mode.” The “use ordinals mode” reply sits inside the same S3-labelled cue — diarization leak; the reply is a host’s. ↩

  42. Behind the Podcast 16 @ 1:21:09. “We have a hang on the show” is ASR garble. Hack’s rebuttal at 1:21:31; pays off at 1:23:25 with “Cypherpunks don’t use Figma.” ↩ ↩2

  43. Behind the Podcast 17 @ 2:25. ASR spells Nostr as “Noster” and Damus as “Domus.” ↩

  44. BTP 21 @ 21:13. Mike is ventriloquising a hypothetical artist, not speaking for himself. ↩

  45. BTP 20 @ 1:21:32. ASR renders “Mags” as “bags” in the preceding cue. ↩

  46. BTP 18 @ 31:26. Evan completes the line at 31:31: “when the transaction fails.” ↩

  47. BTP 18 @ 32:33. Rod at 32:58: “I was talking more, metaphorically.” Evan: “physically, literally.” ↩

  48. BTP 18 @ 33:23. ↩

  49. BTP 18 @ 1:35:03. Evan’s answer at 1:35:16. ↩

  50. Greaser’s Take 1 @ 0:00. Sole speaker-identification anchor in the episode. Greaser’s Take has no wiki page. ↩

  51. Greaser’s Take 1 @ 0:07. ASR renders it “Bitcoin magazine.” David Bailey is not named in this episode. ↩

  52. Greaser’s Take 1 @ 0:14. The title spans two cues. ↩

  53. Greaser’s Take 1 @ 1:00. ↩

  54. Greaser’s Take 1 @ 1:14. ↩

  55. Greaser’s Take 1 @ 1:25. Final cue of the bundle. ↩

  56. Bugle Weekly 80 @ 48:59. Single-cue quote is thin; the sentence spans 48:56–49:07: “Bitcoin Magazine censored their highly anticipated lightning issue.” ↩

  57. Bugle Weekly 80 @ 51:37. ↩

  58. Bugle Weekly 80 @ 51:53. ASR renders PodConf as “PodConf”, “Podkoff” and “Podcom.” ↩

  59. BTP 27 @ 2:03:27. The admission is at 2:07:17 in the same segment, after Paul Sports and Rod agree no Nostr app is any good. ↩

  60. Bugle Weekly 73 @ 59:11. ASR renders him “wait stage HODL.” ↩

  61. Bugle Weekly 73 @ 1:00:38. ↩

  62. Bugle weekly 64 @ 37:40. Closes at 37:58: “There’s no pioneers in the trenches of war.” ↩

  63. Bugle Weekly 75 @ 25:28. The spot’s two voices appear nowhere else in the episode; the University of Bitcoin has no sponsors page. ↩

  64. BTP 23 @ 1:12:24. Odell endorses it at 1:12:53: “I like pioneers. Pioneers is a good one.” ↩

  65. Intellectual Silk Road 4 @ 14:31. Quote spans three cues. ↩

  66. Intellectual Silk Road 4 @ 15:52. ASR: “plugs” for plebs. ↩

  67. Intellectual Silk Road 4 @ 53:19. Quote spans three cues. ASR: “Albus Huxley” for Aldous Huxley. ↩

  68. Intellectual Silk Road 4 @ 17:15. ASR: “WALZ, Satoshi” is Wallet of Satoshi; “Colt Card” is Coldcard. ↩

  69. Intellectual Silk Road 4 @ 18:10. The chapter list titles this segment “Good UX is a security flaw.” ↩

  70. Intellectual Silk Road 4 @ 52:25. Quote spans three cues; “hit why” is ASR for “hit buy.” ↩

  71. Bugle Weekly 96 @ 20:30. “Oscar Connell” is ASR for Nostr. ↩

  72. Bugle Weekly 96 @ 41:33. Punchline at 41:36. ↩

  73. Bugle Weekly 89 @ 23:27. Built across 23:17–23:34; Greaser’s correction at 24:42. OpenDime has no wiki page. ↩

  74. BTP 28 @ 1:11:57. ASR: “Noster” = Nostr. Completed at 1:12:03. ↩

  75. Bugle Weekly 101 @ 18:13. Payoff at 18:20: “I imagine the UX is gonna be bad.” ↩

  76. Bugle Weekly 102 @ 5:00. ↩

  77. Bugle Weekly 110 @ 17:23. ↩

  78. Bugle Weekly 110 @ 28:41. Punchline in the next cue; the thesis at 28:57. ↩ ↩2

  79. Bugle Weekly 110 @ 30:12. ASR “that’s why it’s being eCash” is “that’s why it’s beating eCash.” ↩

  80. Behind the Podcast 16 @ 1:21:09. Greaser’s escalation is at 1:21:23 within the same exchange. ↩