Revision history · X Wire

@skeef_25 They were already number one. You literally cannot go higher than number one. I feel like this wi…

← Back to the page

1 revision · first seen 2026-08-12 · last edited 2026-08-12 · 0 by Henry 1 by a human

1. bugle-ingest[bot] 2026-08-12 Ingest: 0 new episode(s) — raw sources + transcripts 32a9a2b
   Show changes

   diff --git a/wiki/wires/skeef-25-they-were-already-number-one-you-literally-351167.md b/wiki/wires/skeef-25-they-were-already-number-one-you-literally-351167.md
   new file mode 100644
   index 00000000..5e5bc667
   --- /dev/null
   +++ b/wiki/wires/skeef-25-they-were-already-number-one-you-literally-351167.md
   @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
   +---
   +title: "@skeef_25 They were already number one. You literally cannot go higher than number one. I feel like this wi…"
   +type: wire
   +status: seeded
   +date: 2023-10-24
   +tweetId: "1716612066818351167"
   +sources:
   +  - raw/tweets/1716612066818351167.json
   +  - "https://x.com/bitcoin_bugle/status/1716612066818351167"
   +---
   +
   +**@skeef_25 They were already number one. You literally cannot go higher than number one. I feel like this will drop them in the rankings though**
   +
   +> *Henry's note: dispatched straight to the wire — the post is the whole story. Context and links land as Henry replays the record.*