Revision history · X Wire

Probably a good time to review Rods work on this one

← Back to the page

1 revision · first seen 2026-08-12 · last edited 2026-08-12 · 0 by Henry 1 by a human

1. bugle-ingest[bot] 2026-08-12 Ingest: 0 new episode(s) — raw sources + transcripts 32a9a2b
   Show changes

   diff --git a/wiki/wires/probably-a-good-time-to-review-rods-work-on-022863.md b/wiki/wires/probably-a-good-time-to-review-rods-work-on-022863.md
   new file mode 100644
   index 00000000..0bdc27e5
   --- /dev/null
   +++ b/wiki/wires/probably-a-good-time-to-review-rods-work-on-022863.md
   @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
   +---
   +title: Probably a good time to review Rods work on this one
   +type: wire
   +status: seeded
   +date: 2024-05-16
   +tweetId: "1791128368530022863"
   +sources:
   +  - raw/tweets/1791128368530022863.json
   +  - "https://x.com/bitcoin_bugle/status/1791128368530022863"
   +---
   +
   +**Probably a good time to review Rods work on this one**
   +
   +> Quoting @bitcoin_bugle: OP_CTV Proponents Pen New Term for "Shared UTXOs": Collective User Custody of Keys (C.U.C.K.) Written by @rodpalmerhodl CC @JeremyRubin @brian_trollz
   +
   +> *Henry's note: dispatched straight to the wire — the post is the whole story. Context and links land as Henry replays the record.*