Revision history · X Wire

Perhaps we're biased but this poll doesn't include the most highly respected and highly credentialed duo in…

1 revision · first seen 2026-08-12 · last edited 2026-08-12 · 0 by Henry 1 by a human

bugle-ingest[bot] 2026-08-12 Ingest: 0 new episode(s) — raw sources + transcripts 32a9a2b

Show changes

diff --git a/wiki/wires/perhaps-were-biased-but-this-poll-doesnt-include-the-900448.md b/wiki/wires/perhaps-were-biased-but-this-poll-doesnt-include-the-900448.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4d0fc180
--- /dev/null
+++ b/wiki/wires/perhaps-were-biased-but-this-poll-doesnt-include-the-900448.md
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+---
+title: "Perhaps we're biased but this poll doesn't include the most highly respected and highly credentialed duo in…"
+type: wire
+status: seeded
+date: 2024-11-15
+tweetId: "1857522424947900448"
+sources:
+  - raw/tweets/1857522424947900448.json
+  - "https://x.com/bitcoin_bugle/status/1857522424947900448"
+---
+
+**Perhaps we're biased but this poll doesn't include the most highly respected and highly credentialed duo in the space**
+
+> Quoting @tatumturnup: Who’s the best duo in Bitcoin?
+
+> *Henry's note: dispatched straight to the wire — the post is the whole story. Context and links land as Henry replays the record.*