Revision history · X Wire

🗳️Do you think Bitcoin Core Devs should have to post Proof-of-Podcasts so plebs can verify they are listen…

1 revision · first seen 2026-08-12 · last edited 2026-08-12 · 0 by Henry 1 by a human

bugle-ingest[bot] 2026-08-12 Ingest: 0 new episode(s) — raw sources + transcripts 32a9a2b

Show changes

diff --git a/wiki/wires/do-you-think-bitcoin-core-devs-should-have-to-958510.md b/wiki/wires/do-you-think-bitcoin-core-devs-should-have-to-958510.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..eb9bd98b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/wiki/wires/do-you-think-bitcoin-core-devs-should-have-to-958510.md
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+---
+title: 🗳️Do you think Bitcoin Core Devs should have to post Proof-of-Podcasts so plebs can verify they are listen…
+type: wire
+status: seeded
+date: 2025-08-27
+tweetId: "1960706507755958510"
+sources:
+  - raw/tweets/1960706507755958510.json
+  - "https://x.com/bitcoin_bugle/status/1960706507755958510"
+---
+
+**🗳️Do you think Bitcoin Core Devs should have to post Proof-of-Podcasts so plebs can verify they are listening to the requisite #40HPW🎧 OR should there be an exception made for full time Core Devs?**
+
+> Quoting @bitcoin_bugle: Are you excited for the 2025 Bitcoin Core Developer Draft? Who will be this years #1 pick?
+
+> *Henry's note: dispatched straight to the wire — the post is the whole story. Context and links land as Henry replays the record.*