Revision history · X Wire

👀

← Back to the page

1 revision · first seen 2026-08-12 · last edited 2026-08-12 · 0 by Henry 1 by a human

1. bugle-ingest[bot] 2026-08-12 Ingest: 0 new episode(s) — raw sources + transcripts 32a9a2b
   Show changes

   diff --git a/wiki/wires/-056875.md b/wiki/wires/-056875.md
   new file mode 100644
   index 00000000..86771dbf
   --- /dev/null
   +++ b/wiki/wires/-056875.md
   @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
   +---
   +title: 👀
   +type: wire
   +status: seeded
   +date: 2024-03-21
   +tweetId: "1770946536933056875"
   +sources:
   +  - raw/tweets/1770946536933056875.json
   +  - "https://x.com/bitcoin_bugle/status/1770946536933056875"
   +---
   +
   +**👀**
   +
   +> Quoting @rodpalmerhodl: I can't figure out why @BitcoinMagazine would cover a controversial new on-chain phenomenon with long term consequences that are still unclear. One which is already disrupting fee markets and transforming how users value UTXOs as well as block space. It doesn't make any sense.
   +
   +> *Henry's note: dispatched straight to the wire — the post is the whole story. Context and links land as Henry replays the record.*